Harry, you have been warned before, dont bring your antics onto this list, this is about the only list you have been most well behaved on, unlike others, please remember our previous conversations. If you think a posters post violates some RFC, ignore it, or take it up with him in private, do not pollute this list with your bullshit.
Thank you :) On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 19:13 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 07.03.2014 18:58, schrieb Mikhail T.: > > On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote: > >> Sorry, this was posted from gmail... > > Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list > > that use of HTML is something to apologize for? > > nearly any mailing-list has it written clear, some even reject HTML > and on some others you get warned by the owner (postfix as example) > > https://www.google.com/search?q=mailing+list+etiquette+plaintext+only > https://www.google.at/search?q=mailing+list+etiquette+no+html > _____________________ > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html > > Note: Spam filters don't like messages with empty Subjects; just use e.g. > "subscribe" or "unsubscribe". Spam filters are also more likely to reject > HTML-formatted messages; please use plain text > > > With all due sympathies to Reindl's medical condition, why must we -- > > in the second decade of the 21st century -- deny ourselves the means > > of expression afforded by HTML on this list? > > because the message had no single HTML formatting and > was written in plain but as HTML may be a godd reason > > it hardly makes sense to write email in HTML, they just > explode after some replies/quotes and forwardings with > different clients while a conversation in plaintext > survises thousands of replies without lose a sane quoting >
<<attachment: face-smile.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
