On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
> cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
> gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
> will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be proposed
> which either (1) removes r1573360 or (2) fixes this bug.

Agreed, if it were only about 1.0.1e vs. 1.0.1f it would be not that big
an issue but since all Major versions seem to show the behavior and
there's no easy workaround for 0.9.8 except upgrading to 1.x, I'd say we
should implement the workaround suggested by Steve.

Regards,

Rainer

Reply via email to