On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:32:18AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > FWIW, I think it is reasonable to say "This *is* a private mod_ssl > > interface for the purposes of introducing some modularity within this > > particular SSL/TLS implementation, and these interfaces aren't intended > for > > third-party modules." That's not how I coded it, but now that somebody > has > > actually looked I'm curious about your thoughts. > > Hmmm, I think the only distinction that matters is whether it's in a > header installed by "make install". I don't think we can successfully > hide private APIs in public headers, modules will use them regardless of > the "here be dragons" comments - or e.g. CORE_PRIVATE! > > Regards, Joe > Well, yes ;) But punt for now. In the short term I need it to be easy to build the CT module outside of httpd, so install it is. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/ http://edjective.org/
