That would be at least half my fault for responding off-list... Here it is:
---------------------------- Thanks -- I went with ^ Shouldn't have much worry about responding to dev@ On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Houser, Rick <rick.hou...@us.pgds.com> wrote: > New to this list, so responding directly until I have a better feel.... > > Wouldn't a three character tag be safer with the first being a dedicated > (unused) prefix to unlock the additional bytes, like Unicode? Something like > this: > > _<char1><char2> (note, I didn't check if _ was used -- just using it as an > example) > > > Rick Houser Rick Houser Web Administration (517)367-3516 > -----Original Message----- > From: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > [mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:56 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: stop copying footers to r->headers_in? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014 16:52 > > To: Apache HTTP Server Development List > > Subject: Re: stop copying footers to r->headers_in? > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > > <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > Is there a way for people with such a setup to fix this with a different > > config? > > > From the top of my head I would say no and that would be a blocker. > > > > Do you think the required '^' prefix in the followup is enough? In > > I think I missed the follow up. Where can I find it? > > Regards > > Rüdiger
