Michael, can you please compare 2.2.27 to 2.2.29? 2.2 in testing doesn't resemble 2.4. That said, we are simply concerned about any potential regressions in the legacy branch.
Thanks for the feedback! Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote: >built on a second server, but at AIX 5.3 TL12 (5300-12-05-1140), previous >report was on AIX 5.3 TL7 (5300-07-10-0943) - so the differences (more tests >passed) may be related to that. However, on the old AIX 5.3 TL7 to 2.4.9 tests >(nearly) all pass. > >BOTH are reporting some failed CVE tests! > > >With --enable-proxy added, for more tests, result is now: > >Test Summary Report >------------------- >t/apache/chunkinput.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 3 >t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 2-3 >t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 2 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 2. >t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 2 >t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 4) > Failed tests: 3-4, 7-8 >t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 1-2 >t/ssl/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 172 Failed: 10) > Failed tests: 3-7, 116-120 >t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 9 >Files=109, Tests=3731, 293 wallclock secs ( 1.51 usr 0.22 sys + 45.93 cusr >15.62 csys = 63.28 CPU) >Result: FAIL >Failed 8/109 test programs. 21/3731 subtests failed. >[warning] server loopback:8529 shutdown >[warning] port 8529 still in use... >......done >[ error] error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log) > >Hope this helps! > > > >On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >package builds fine using the build/aix scripts, except these ignore, if >possible, the srcapr that was included in the tarball. > >Question: is the .gdbinit in tarball root part of the distro now? > >Apeche::Test returned these errors >Test Summary Report >------------------- >t/apache/server_name_port.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 84 tests but ran 0. >t/protocol/nntp-like.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0. >t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 >t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0. >t/ssl/basicauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 2-3 >t/ssl/env.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 23) > Failed tests: 1-8, 16-30 >t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) > Failed tests: 1-4 >t/ssl/fakeauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 2-3 >t/ssl/headers.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) > Failed tests: 1-3 >t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 8) > Failed tests: 1-8 >t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) > Failed tests: 1-4 >t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 5) > Failed tests: 2, 5-7, 9 >t/ssl/v2.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 >t/ssl/varlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 73 Failed: 73) > Failed tests: 1-73 >t/ssl/verify.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 2 >Files=109, Tests=3337, 400 wallclock secs ( 4.73 usr 0.42 sys + 95.87 cusr >62.90 csys = 163.92 CPU) >Result: FAIL >Failed 15/109 test programs. 127/3337 subtests failed. > >Will run again with --enable-proxy as I noticed all those tests are being >skipped. And may have to do something similiar for the _auth_ modules. They do >not look to all being tested. > >FYI only - as I do not believe I have a vote to give. > >I would like to mention, re: the tests, that most, if not all, pass with >httpd-2.4.9 > > > >On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> >wrote: > >The pre-release candidate Apache httpd 2.2.29 - with simply a rebuild >of the docs/manual/ since 2.2.28, can be found in; > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > +/-1 > [ ] Release 2.2.29 (apr 1.5.1, apr-util 1.5.3) > >Please take note of APR subversion version bump from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1 >since 2.2.27 was released. > >Vote to conclude 18:00 GMT Monday, provided enough voters have had time >to review. > > >
