Yes, I will compare with the 2.2.27 branch for regressions. I just completed a comparison of 2.2.x and 2.4.x.
Maybe you can help me with the correct configure settings to really get all modules - without resorting to maintainer mode. ======== Just wanted to compare both 2.2.x and 2.4.x (say 2.2.30 and 2.4.11 internally) URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x Repository Root: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 Revision: 1620143 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: nd Last Changed Rev: 1620064 Last Changed Date: 2014-08-23 19:54:35 +0000 (Sat, 23 Aug 2014) compared with URL: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x Repository Root: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 Revision: 1620143 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: nd Last Changed Rev: 1620072 Last Changed Date: 2014-08-23 20:19:04 +0000 (Sat, 23 Aug 2014) The configure command for 2.2.x is: ./configure CFLAGS=-O2 --enable-layout=AIX --with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config --with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config\ --with-mpm=worker --enable-ssl --enable-mods-shared=all --enable-proxy and for 2.4.x is: ./configure --enable-layout=AIX --with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config --with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config\ --enable-mpms-shared=all --enable-mods-shared=all --disable-lua == Observation == Although I am intending that all mods are built and loaded, it looks as if I am not getting that result for the 2.4.X as it's test shows many tests being skipped because mods are missing. That might explain why 2.4.X has fewer failed tests: 2.2.X has (17/109) compared with 2.4.X (1/97) ===================================================================================================== Apache--2.2.x test report Test Summary Report ------------------- t/apache/server_name_port.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 84 tests but ran 0. t/modules/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 17 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 9-10 t/protocol/nntp-like.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0. t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0. t/ssl/basicauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 2-3 t/ssl/env.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 23) Failed tests: 1-8, 16-30 t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/ssl/fakeauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 2-3 t/ssl/headers.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 1-3 t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 8) Failed tests: 1-8 t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/ssl/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 172 Failed: 118) Failed tests: 3-7, 60-172 t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 2, 5-7, 9 t/ssl/v2.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 t/ssl/varlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 73 Failed: 73) Failed tests: 1-73 t/ssl/verify.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Files=109, Tests=3543, 616 wallclock secs ( 5.15 usr 0.42 sys + 98.30 cusr 64.99 csys = 168.86 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 17/109 test programs. 247/3543 subtests failed. [warning] server loopback:8529 shutdown [warning] port 8529 still in use... ......done ===================================================================================================== Apache-2.4.x - Test Report t/security/CVE-2003-0542.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'rewrite' t/security/CVE-2004-0747.t .......... ok t/security/CVE-2004-0811.t .......... ok t/security/CVE-2004-0940.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'include' t/security/CVE-2004-0942.t .......... ok t/security/CVE-2004-0958.t .......... skipped: cannot find one of php4 or php5 or sapi_apache2.c t/security/CVE-2004-0959.t .......... skipped: cannot find one of php4 or php5 or sapi_apache2.c, PHP not installed t/security/CVE-2005-2491.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'rewrite' t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'mod_ssl' t/security/CVE-2005-3352.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'imagemap', cannot find module 'imap' t/security/CVE-2005-3357.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'mod_ssl' t/security/CVE-2006-5752.t .......... ok t/security/CVE-2007-5000.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'imagemap', cannot find module 'imap' t/security/CVE-2007-6388.t .......... ok t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'proxy' t/security/CVE-2009-1195.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'include' t/security/CVE-2009-1890.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'mod_proxy', cannot find module 'proxy_http.c' t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'ssl' t/security/CVE-2011-3368-rewrite.t .. skipped: cannot find module 'rewrite' t/security/CVE-2011-3368.t .......... skipped: cannot find module 'proxy' t/ssl/all.t ......................... skipped: cannot find module 'mod_ssl' Test Summary Report ------------------- t/apache/chunkinput.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) Failed test: 3 Files=97, Tests=2894, 382 wallclock secs ( 3.85 usr 0.38 sys + 88.76 cusr 82.22 csys = 175.21 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/97 test programs. 1/2894 subtests failed. [warning] server loopback:8529 shutdown [warning] port 8529 still in use... On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Michael, can you please compare 2.2.27 to 2.2.29? 2.2 in testing doesn't > resemble 2.4. That said, we are simply concerned about any potential > regressions in the legacy branch. > > Thanks for the feedback! > > > Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > built on a second server, but at AIX 5.3 TL12 (5300-12-05-1140), previous > report was on AIX 5.3 TL7 (5300-07-10-0943) - so the differences (more > tests passed) may be related to that. However, on the old AIX 5.3 TL7 to > 2.4.9 tests (nearly) all pass. > > BOTH are reporting some failed CVE tests! > > With --enable-proxy added, for more tests, result is now: > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/apache/chunkinput.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 3 > t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 2-3 > t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 2 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 255 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 2. > t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 2 > t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 4) > Failed tests: 3-4, 7-8 > t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 1-2 > t/ssl/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 172 Failed: 10) > Failed tests: 3-7, 116-120 > t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 9 > Files=109, Tests=3731, 293 wallclock secs ( 1.51 usr 0.22 sys + 45.93 > cusr 15.62 csys = 63.28 CPU) > Result: FAIL > Failed 8/109 test programs. 21/3731 subtests failed. > [warning] server loopback:8529 shutdown > [warning] port 8529 still in use... > ......done > [ error] error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log) > > Hope this helps! > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> package builds fine using the build/aix scripts, except these ignore, if >> possible, the srcapr that was included in the tarball. >> >> Question: is the .gdbinit in tarball root part of the distro now? >> >> Apeche::Test returned these errors >> Test Summary Report >> ------------------- >> t/apache/server_name_port.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) >> Non-zero exit status: 255 >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 84 tests but ran 0. >> t/protocol/nntp-like.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) >> Non-zero exit status: 255 >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0. >> t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 1 >> t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) >> Non-zero exit status: 255 >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0. >> t/ssl/basicauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 2-3 >> t/ssl/env.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 23) >> Failed tests: 1-8, 16-30 >> t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) >> Failed tests: 1-4 >> t/ssl/fakeauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 2-3 >> t/ssl/headers.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) >> Failed tests: 1-3 >> t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 8) >> Failed tests: 1-8 >> t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) >> Failed tests: 1-4 >> t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 5) >> Failed tests: 2, 5-7, 9 >> t/ssl/v2.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 1 >> t/ssl/varlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 73 Failed: 73) >> Failed tests: 1-73 >> t/ssl/verify.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 2 >> Files=109, Tests=3337, 400 wallclock secs ( 4.73 usr 0.42 sys + 95.87 >> cusr 62.90 csys = 163.92 CPU) >> Result: FAIL >> Failed 15/109 test programs. 127/3337 subtests failed. >> >> Will run again with --enable-proxy as I noticed all those tests are being >> skipped. And may have to do something similiar for the _auth_ modules. They >> do not look to all being tested. >> >> FYI only - as I do not believe I have a vote to give. >> >> I would like to mention, re: the tests, that most, if not all, pass with >> httpd-2.4.9 >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. < >> wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> >>> The pre-release candidate Apache httpd 2.2.29 - with simply a rebuild >>> of the docs/manual/ since 2.2.28, can be found in; >>> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> +/-1 >>> [ ] Release 2.2.29 (apr 1.5.1, apr-util 1.5.3) >>> >>> Please take note of APR subversion version bump from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1 >>> since 2.2.27 was released. >>> >>> Vote to conclude 18:00 GMT Monday, provided enough voters have had time >>> to review. >>> >> >> >
