On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:01 PM, <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > --------- Original Message --------- > Subject: Re: C99 bump prior to apr 2.0? > From: "Gregg Smith" <g...@gknw.net> > Date: 9/4/14 12:47 pm > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > > On 9/4/2014 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > I overlooked 2 other viable options > > > > [ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.2 (pre-breakage) and > > corresponding binaries > > [ ] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.4 (upon release) and > > corresponding binaries > > > Assumes a much quicker path to everything hitting the mirrors and > looking at 1.5.3's change log later yesterday I did not see anything VC > crucial so > [X] Roll -win32-src-r2.zip with apr-util 1.5.2 (pre-breakage) and > corresponding binaries. > > > If I hear no objections today, this is how I'll proceed for the time being. > > It might be worthwhile to roll a win32-src-r3 later on with 1.5.4 but I > don't > see a reason to wait on it. Both 1.5.2, 1.5.3 and someday, 1.5.4 are ASF > releases so I don't think we are disturbing the release policy by moving > ahead with both plans. httpd-2.2.29 itself doesn't appear to have any > hiccups (except the reference to 2.4.x+ compatibility for MergeTrailers, > a defect already corrected on the online docs). > > > > >
Sorry for not replying earlier... Can you just point to a patch in the APR patches directory? -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
