On Apr 15, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > IMO it would be appropriate to instead go one by one and make sure we're > using an appropriate name to begin with for these functions that are > squatting the SSL namespace, instead of making these often-bewildering names > ugly and (still) bewildering.
+1 Best, Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski <> victor.j.orlikow...@alumni.duke.edu
