On 15.04.2015 18:36, Stefan Sperling wrote: > However, the actual issue here is that mod_ssl is squatting the SSL_ > namespace. > Historically this may have made sense (it seems mod_ssl and OpenSSL have > shared history/authors). Bill Rowe suggested to try moving mod_ssl's > functions into the ap_ namespace to avoid such clashes in the future.
Agreed that mod_ssl should avoid stepping into the SSL_* yard. As pointed out by Jeff, ap_* is fairly foreign in the mod_ssl case, though, and my preference is for s/SSL_/ssl_/ for functions and s/SSL_/MODSSL_/ for constants (in the latter case, there's actually quite some more stuff lurking - SSL_OPT_*, SSL_PROTOCOL_* etc.). > I'm not sure how README.dsov.ps should be regenerated. > It contains a refence to SSL_get_app_data2(). > For now I've only updated the .dsov.fig file. With fig2dev probably. Though in this simple case, a direct edit of README.dsov.ps seems sufficient. Kaspar
