Agreed. We should also, everytime we catch something like this, add a test-case to the perl test framework to ensure we don't trip over it again :)
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > > Am 22.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Jeff Trawick: >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com >> <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: >> >> Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm. >> >> Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE. >> >> Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will T&R 2.4.16 >> forthwith. >> >> >> Thanks, Jim! We'll get through this eventually :) >> >> (And thanks Steffen and Reindl too!) > > +1 to both statements. > > My test went threw nicely, but due to the problem with the RedirectMatch I > would have also voted -1. > > It is good we have those additional testers in the loop. > > Thanks > > Rainer >
