On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > >> Am 25.09.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>: >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Eissing >> <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: >>> >>> I see. And rename the configuration options and documentation, while we are >>> at it... >> >> Note that I'm *not* against the name being h2! > > Yann, I know. And I do not want to say that "http2" is a wrong name. Or that > I could not live with it. However, I increasingly feel that such notions as > adding a "--enabled-http2" for making it look nicer, is not properly > addressing the issue:
I won't argue here, you are totally right. I didn't mean to be punctilious about the name, but thought naively (at the time) that "--enable-http2" magic would have pleased every one... That rather proves to complicate things :/ > > - Modules are configured with --enable-<modname> > - Modules are loaded with LoadModule <modname>_module > modules/mod_<modname>.so" > - Modules documentation are found in docs/manual/mod/mod_<modname>.html > - Config directives are by default <modname, camelcase>* > - test cases, etc. ... > > So, either someone has the time to do all this, or I propose we leave it as > is and remove the "--enable-http2" again. +1 for the latter (still), and sorry for the troubles.
