On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Mikhail T. <mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
> On 24.11.2015 10:08, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > As long as this function is promoted for fast ASCII-specific token > recognition and has no other unexpected equalities, it serves a useful > purpose. > > Because of this, I'd suggest renaming it to something, that emphasizes it > being ASCII-only. > Strictly speaking, you are referring to US-ASCII, while the actual function including the EBCDIC build follows LC_CTYPE/LC_COLLATE C or POSIX (equivalent names for the same thing) and is honoring LC_COLLATE of the US-ASCII ordering. apr_strcasecmp_lcposix or apr_strcasecmp_lcc might be a usable name. Other suggestions? I was leaning toward apr_strcasecmp_token since that is a pretty well recognized RFC term and usually refers to the ASCII set. For HTTPbis, token is defined at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.2.6
