It's for these types of reasons that I suggest that instead of looking at this as some replacement for strcasecmp, we instead look at the function on how we actually *use* it. As far as I know, we simply use it to see if 2 strings are equal, ignoring ASCII case. I could be wrong, and I'm sure someone will point out if and where I am :) But even so, if *that* is the use case, then we are free to define the function (and create whatever name) however we want.
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:07 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: >> Well, we are sorting the entire ASCII so I guess we can drop "for >> alpha-numerics only". > > Maybe it was fixed and I missed it, but didn't you point > out that [] were not sorted right relative to alphas per > POSIX strcasecmp?
