On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > In a sep thread on dev@apr, OtherBill appears to be trying to > determine the "right" name for the APR impl... maube we should > wait to see what it's decided on there and we can follow > suit.
OK, although we won't be able to use APR's functions until we require (at least) APR-1.6.x. Maybe a follow up patch/backport could later "#define ap_casecmpstr[n] apr_whatever" when available? > > PS: What determines "abusive" usage? When used to compare something which is not a HTTP token or a scheme (eg. config parameters). As I see it, the valid usage is against remote/untrusted data known to be defined in POSIX/C locale only...
