On 12/15/2015 03:16 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: > On 12/15/2015 02:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Jan Kaluža <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think I've just fixed that in <http://svn.apache.org/r1720129>. I will >>> also propose that for 2.4.x and 2.2.x. >> >> Shouldn't we do the same for ecparams below? > > Probably yes, I was just checking the arguments which get passed to > "SSL_CTX_set_*" functions. I think you are right we should call > EC_GROUP_free there.
According to my tests with trunk there is still a problem, the ENGINE_cleanup() doesn't finish the engines, I have tried to use CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp() to find the leak but there are too many of them to find where we miss a "free()". Any idea on the topic? Cheers Jean-Frederic
