On 01/06/2016 01:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:28 PM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 03:16 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: >>> On 12/15/2015 02:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>>> Hi Jan, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Jan Kaluža <jkal...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think I've just fixed that in <http://svn.apache.org/r1720129>. I will >>>>> also propose that for 2.4.x and 2.2.x. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't we do the same for ecparams below? >>> >>> Probably yes, I was just checking the arguments which get passed to >>> "SSL_CTX_set_*" functions. I think you are right we should call >>> EC_GROUP_free there. >> >> According to my tests with trunk there is still a problem, the >> ENGINE_cleanup() doesn't finish the engines, I have tried to use >> CRYPTO_mem_leaks_fp() to find the leak but there are too many of them to >> find where we miss a "free()". >> >> Any idea on the topic? > > I just committed (r1723295) a fix for the leak mentioned above.
It doesn't help :-( > Do you also use some custom ecparams in the certificate file? No the core also happens without any parameter in the certificate file. Cheers Jean-Frederic
