> On Jan 13, 2016, at 12:28 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I can see us moving those modules into trunk (not 2.4), retaining the > mmn tests for 2.2 and 2.4 compat, and then deriving an fcgid release > out of trunk/modules/fcgid/. But I'm not clear why we would want to > maintain the duplication between mod_proxy_fcgi and mod_fcgid? > Individually they get little enough attention as it is. >
Because they are separate solutions to a similar problem, ala mod_sed and mod_substitute for example. I can site several more if that is worthwhile (but the point is made) mod_fcgid does not require the whole mod_proxy overhead, for example, but lacks some features that mod_proxy_fcgi does have, since the latter can leverage some of that "overhead". > Just my 2c USD, I'm open to ideas. That is good to know.
