On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > What I have in mind is to swap the apr_socket_t with a apr_pollfd_t, with all > operation staying the same.
I don't think I had a good reason for going one way or the other, +1 here. Trunk-only and presumably nobody consuming it from the lack of feedback. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
