Re: Proposed change to mpm_register_socket_callback(): apr_socket_t -> apr_pollfd_t

[Graham Leggett]

On 13 Mar 2016, at 10:53 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think I had a good reason for going one way or the other, +1
> here.  Trunk-only and presumably nobody consuming it from the lack of
> feedback.

From what I can see, this was never backported to v2.4.

Regards,
Graham
—