> Am 13.04.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: >> >> To me it looks like the "right" way of handling SSLProxy* config would be >> per <Proxy>. > > ++1
+1 > >> Did anyone else already encounter a similar problem? Any >> thoughts or experiments on how to solve this for the future? > > Not sure how to handle this since <Proxy> is in mod_proxy whereas > SSLProxy* are in mod_ssl. > <Proxy> is a dir_config still, not sure how we could make it > available/shared in/with mod_ssl... For the user it makes more sense to have Proxy settings inside <Proxy>. I always found the SSLProxy* confusing, although I can of course understand how implementation drove this... -Stefan
