On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Stefan Eissing
<stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> Done in r1740075.
>
> I was thinking of a nicer solution, but that involved inventing new hooks 
> which seems not worth it.
>
> Since this area of protocol negotiation has already been talked about in 
> regard to TLS upgrades
> and websockets, I do not want to invest in the current way of handling this 
> too much time.

I really don't see why we couldn't upgrade to h2 from "http:" (not
"https:" since ALPN did not take place already, or would have done
it).
ISTM that "Upgrade: h2" could be valid in response to a (plain) HTTP/1
request, and the client could upgrade from there...

Regards,
Yann.

PS: feel free to ignore this message since that's already ruled :)

Reply via email to