> On May 16, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so >> would be > > I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe > it ;-) > > > On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Hmmm... The balancer-manager page does display the configured >> values for 'hcpasses' and 'hcfails' as well as the current count >> of passes/fails. Is that sufficient? > > Yeah - didn't think about that. It'd be fine for my purposes. It could > be a PITA if someone is monitoring for a specific string like > "transitive" or "fail", but it's probably not worth monkeying with. >
Yeah... let's mull this over and see what makes the most sense.
