Is a regression. Better to have the fix in GA.
> Op 20 jun. 2016 om 13:51 heeft Stefan Eissing <[email protected]>
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Yes. Everything else is +1. Just this. Just wanted to express that I do not
> see it as blocking, but am not happy about it either.
>
>> Am 20.06.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Although not required, I am curious about the +0 vote. Is it
>> due totally to the non-release breaking bug? (the one fixed
>> w/ the 'h2_beam_abort(stream->input);' line added to h2_mplx.c) ?
>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Stefan Eissing <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Tested:
>>> (15.5.0 Darwin): event, prefork, worker
>>> (14.04.1-Ubuntu, x86_64): event, worker
>>>
>>> Vote: +0
>>>
>>> The bug discovered by Michael Kaufmann is not release breaking for me. If
>>> we'd find another issue, I would bring in the fix.
>>>
>>> -Stefan
>>>
>>>> Am 16.06.2016 um 19:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
>>>> at the usual place:
>>>>
>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>>
>>>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>>>> [ ] +0: meh
>>>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>>>>
>>>> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>>>>
>>>> Thx!
>
