Yes, I am trending the same way...
> On Jun 20, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>
> Is a regression. Better to have the fix in GA.
>
>> Op 20 jun. 2016 om 13:51 heeft Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Yes. Everything else is +1. Just this. Just wanted to express that I do not
>> see it as blocking, but am not happy about it either.
>>
>>> Am 20.06.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>:
>>>
>>> Although not required, I am curious about the +0 vote. Is it
>>> due totally to the non-release breaking bug? (the one fixed
>>> w/ the 'h2_beam_abort(stream->input);' line added to h2_mplx.c) ?
>>>
>>>> On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tested:
>>>> (15.5.0 Darwin): event, prefork, worker
>>>> (14.04.1-Ubuntu, x86_64): event, worker
>>>>
>>>> Vote: +0
>>>>
>>>> The bug discovered by Michael Kaufmann is not release breaking for me. If
>>>> we'd find another issue, I would bring in the fix.
>>>>
>>>> -Stefan
>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.06.2016 um 19:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
>>>>> at the usual place:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1: Good to go
>>>>> [ ] +0: meh
>>>>> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thx!
>>
>
