Ugg... Thanks for the test and the feedback. Will hold off
and look into it.

> On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:13 AM, Jens Schleusener <jens.schleuse...@t-online.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
>> Subj sez it all... afaict, there are no showstoppers and
>> no outstanding issues (none seen in STATUS, or noted as
>> such on any Email threads).
>> 
>> Sooooo... anyone opposed to a T&R tomorrow in the hopes
>> of getting this out to people by the start of next week??
> 
> Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via
> 
> svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x
> 
> and did for building the "configure" script a
> 
> src/httpd-2.4.x> ./buildconf
> 
> found apr source: srclib/apr
> rebuilding srclib/apr/configure
> buildconf: checking installation...
> buildconf: python version 2.7.9 (ok)
> buildconf: autoconf version 2.69 (ok)
> buildconf: libtool version 2.4.2 (ok)
> buildconf: copying libtool helper files using /usr/bin/libtoolize
> buildconf: creating include/arch/unix/apr_private.h.in ...
> buildconf: creating configure ...
> buildconf: generating 'make' outputs ...
> buildconf: rebuilding rpm spec file
> copying build files
> rebuilding include/ap_config_auto.h.in
> rebuilding configure
> rebuilding rpm spec file
> fixing timestamps for ap_expr sources
> 
> and then issued
> 
> src/httpd-2.4.x> ./configure --enable-mods-shared=few
> 
> configure: loading site script /usr/share/site/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking for chosen layout... Apache
> [... many lines deleted ...]
> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_express... no (few)
> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... checking dependencies
> configure: WARNING: "mod_proxy is disabled but required for mod_proxy_hcheck"
> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... configure: error:
> mod_proxy_hcheck has been requested but can not be built due to prerequisite 
> failures
> 
> So it appears not the identical but a similar failure compared to that one I 
> reported some days ago ("Small problem in "configure" script with 2.4.21"): 
> Now "mod_watchdog" is replaced by "mod_proxy".
> 
> And again: Since the option "--enable-mods-shared=few" doesn't include any 
> "proxy"-related modules I also don't expect to build the "reverse-proxy 
> health-check module".
> 
> I am not sure if there is still a problem or if my "configure" building and 
> testing is incorrect.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jens
> 

Reply via email to