On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener
<jens.schleuse...@t-online.de> wrote:
Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x
src/httpd-2.4.x> ./buildconf
src/httpd-2.4.x> ./configure --enable-mods-shared=few
configure: loading site script /usr/share/site/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for chosen layout... Apache
[... many lines deleted ...]
checking whether to enable mod_proxy_express... no (few)
checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... checking dependencies
configure: WARNING: "mod_proxy is disabled but required for mod_proxy_hcheck"
checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... configure: error:
mod_proxy_hcheck has been requested but can not be built due to prerequisite
failures
So it appears not the identical but a similar failure compared to that one I
reported some days ago
("Small problem in "configure" script with 2.4.21"): Now "mod_watchdog" is replaced by
"mod_proxy".
And again: Since the option "--enable-mods-shared=few" doesn't include any
"proxy"-related modules I
also don't expect to build the "reverse-proxy health-check module".
I am not sure if there is still a problem or if my "configure" building and
testing is incorrect.
There is still a problem, and it relates to a special case handling
of the underlying 'few' token. Found it, more updates shortly...
... good news.
So now nearly superfluous info but just for completeness: Your first patch
for modules/proxy/config.m4 sent at "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:32:02 -0500"
solved at least the superficial problem and let the configure run end
without an error.
But caused by some cut&paste unicode errors and since your diff has within
the 3 trailing unified lines the line
enable_proxy_hcheck="no";
where the original file modules/proxy/config.m4 has at line number 67
enable_proxy_hcheck="";
I had to apply the patch manually.
Jens
