> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely >> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On >> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box >> default to strict parsing. > > +1. > > (I have no strong opinions on whether or not this should go into the next > release, though.) >
Any more thoughts related to this? I know that it is still being worked here and there, but knowing whether or not it will be folded in 2.4.24 might be incentive to finish polishing as it were.
