I'd like to see us work on having a 2.4.24 out sometime this month... Can we spend some time on existing backports and seeing what of usefulness in trunk *can and should* be backported to 2.4?
Thx!! > On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion <champio...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely >>> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On >>> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box >>> default to strict parsing. >> >> +1. >> >> (I have no strong opinions on whether or not this should go into the next >> release, though.) >> > > Any more thoughts related to this? I know that it is > still being worked here and there, but knowing whether or > not it will be folded in 2.4.24 might be incentive to > finish polishing as it were. >
