> On Dec 9, 2016, at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > > Instead, maybe we could backport all that stuff to 2.4, in a backwards > compatible fashion. That is, basically backport trunk to 2.4. This > would give us more runway to work on httpd-nextgen. > > That is very unrealistic, given that the trunk patches have broken > ABI more than once a month for four years. Adapting such patches > would lead to many more inane forks like the HttpProtocol Strict > backport effort. >
Well, instead of just throwing one's hands up and saying "That is very unrealistic" I am sure that there are some among us who instead are obstructionists, actually want to drive this project further along and would, as I explicitly state, try to figure out some way of doing so in a "backwards compatible fashion."
