On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:42 PM, <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Mon Dec 26 21:42:26 2016 > New Revision: 1776076 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776076&view=rev > Log: > revert back... no conflict w/ name
I think I'd prefer another name than "ProxyProtocol" (on/off...), still. It may be misleading wrt to named protocols we may handle later for things like Upgrade forwarding or ALPN on the backend side (even if we'll/d use something like ProxyUpgradeProtocols or ProxyALPNProtocols then, booking the simple/generic ProxyProtocol name by now is not evolutive enough, IMHO). How about "ProxyProtocolLine on/off"?
