> On Jun 1, 2017, at 4:40 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > wrote: > > What could a change of "experimental" do? > > - A. It could address the FUD. Which I assume is important for market shares. > And for people who have done serious investments (successful ones) in httpd > in the past, be it money or time.
Not so much market shares, for market share reasons, but simply that people who could and should be using httpd for http/2 simply aren't. It's a blocker to having more people use it, which means less bug reports and less feedback on fixes, etc... > > - B. People come out and say: "when experimental is gone, I might finally > find the time to improving HTTP/2 support with the great ideas and/or long > time experience that I have!" > There is that as well... it's no good having a substantial module with very, very limited expertise shared and involvement.
