Why lump 2.5.0 into all this? There is no rational reason to force connect 2.4.29 and 2.5.0
Tag 2.4.29 and leave 2.5.0 alone until people discuss it. Until then I will veto any foolishness about 2.5.0-whatever. > On Oct 13, 2017, at 9:19 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > Is anyone seeing an issue of concern about stability on 2.4.x branch? > > Has anyone else looked at Jim's proposed fixes for xcode 9 building > under maintainer mode? A couple-line quick fix to configure.in > <http://configure.in/>, that > anyone on OS/X should be able to validate in minutes. The same fix > is already present on APR's branches, which I will tag as well. > > I'll proceed to tag 2.5.0, and 2.4.29 after a couple hour comment > period, so that the many proposed enhancements can be examined > by alpha testers and our quick adopters of 2.4.28 can be back on track > by early next week. That should simplify getting some of the more > complex patches backported as necessary, or move us forward > in any case. > >
