On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:19 PM <rj...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: rjung > Date: Tue Aug 7 14:19:31 2018 > New Revision: 1837599 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1837599&view=rev > Log: > Propose a few monitoring improvements. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1837599&r1=1837598&r2=1837599&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Aug 7 14:19:31 2018 > @@ -200,6 +200,41 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > 2.4.x patch: http://home.apache.org/~jim/patches/socache_redis.patch > +1: jim, > > + *) mod_proxy: Improve the balancer member data shown > + in mod_status when "ProxyStatus" is "On": > + add "busy" count and show byte counts in auto > + mode always in units of kilobytes. > + trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1837588 > + 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1837588 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > + (adjust CHANGES) > + +1: rjung > + > + *) mod_status: Complete the data shown for async > + MPMs in "auto" mode. Added number of processes, > + number of stopping processes and number > + of busy and idle workers. > + trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1837589 > + 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1837589 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > + (adjust CHANGES) > + +1: rjung > + > + *) mod_status: Add cumulated response duration time > + in milliseconds. > + trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1837590 > + 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1837590 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > + (adjust CHANGES and include/ap_mmn.h) > + +1: rjung > + > + *) mod_status: Cumulate CPU time of exited child > + processes in the "cu" and "cs" values. > + Add CPU time of the parent process to the > + "c" and "s" values. > + trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1837595 > + 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1837595 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > + (adjust CHANGES and include/ap_mmn.h) > + +1: rjung
Those changes look fine (and great) to me, I wanted to +1 but I'm wondering if they really belong in 2.4.x since the output of mod_status is changed in a way that could break existing parsers. I don't know the "policy" here...
