Hello, On 2018-08-28 10:54, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > As we unwind various regressions and breakage, one non-lethal but > somewhat horrid report stands out. Eric correctly tied it to the patch > applied for https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62590 in the > 2.4.24 timeframe.
I'd like to comment on the last entry in the ticket: --- For 100% clarity, this was observed with the version of ab shipped with 2.2.34, or the version shipped with 2.4.24? It should be obvious that ab has also undergone some enhancements and changes for support of TLS, and the two different versions are expected to produce two different results. --- It shouldn't matter which version was used as long as the same one was used for both tests. According to the ab output, Paolo used the same version for both tests: This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Unfortunately this output is useless unless you know the revision numbers by hart. It looks like it is a 2.2 version, but I could be wrong. (A 2.4 version has a revision around 1826891.) Note to devs: it would be great, if ab could use the same version numbers as the server. ;-) Cheers, K. C. -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek KeyID 0x172380A011EF4944 Key fingerprint = 8A55 70C1 BD85 D34E ADBC 386C 1723 80A0 11EF 4944 /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
