As we unwind various regressions and breakage, one non-lethal but somewhat
horrid report stands out. Eric correctly tied it to the patch applied for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62590 in the 2.4.24
timeframe.
Server Software: Apache/2.2.34
SSL/TLS Protocol: TLSv1/SSLv3,AES256-GCM-SHA384,1024,256
vs
Server Software: Apache/2.4.34SSL/TLS Protocol:
TLSv1/SSLv3,AES256-GCM-SHA384,1024,256
Measures out with
Time taken for tests: 192.131 seconds Total transferred: 731130414 bytes
HTML transferred: 88000000 bytes Requests per second: 10409.59 [#/sec]
(mean) Time per request: 5.764 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.096 [ms]
(mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 3716.20 [Kbytes/sec]
received
vs
Time taken for tests: 571.058 seconds
Total transferred: 689130083 bytes
HTML transferred: 90000000 bytes
Requests per second: 3502.27 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 17.132 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.286 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 1178.48 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.4 0 87
Processing: 0 6 1.2 6 71
Waiting: 0 6 1.2 5 70
Total: 0 6 1.3 6 98
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 6
66% 6
75% 6
80% 6
90% 7
95% 8
98% 9
99% 10
100% 98 (longest request)
----
I did then the same for Apache/2.4.34 (with apr-1.6.3 and
apr-util-1.6.1), with the following changes in the httpd.conf
(including ssl-support):
StartServers 1
ServerLimit 1
ThreadLimit 2500
ThreadsPerChild 2500
ThreadStackSize 1048576
MinSpareThreads 1
MaxSpareThreads 500
MaxRequestWorkers 2500
MaxConnectionsPerChild 0
and here the output of ApacheBench:
ab -k -n 2000000 -c 60 'https://adnvl005:44300/'
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking adnvl005 (be patient)
Completed 200000 requests
Completed 400000 requests
Completed 600000 requests
Completed 800000 requests
Completed 1000000 requests
Completed 1200000 requests
Completed 1400000 requests
Completed 1600000 requests
Completed 1800000 requests
Completed 2000000 requests
Finished 2000000 requests
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 2.1 0 208
Processing: 0 17 20.3 10 285
Waiting: 0 17 20.3 10 285
Total: 0 17 20.4 10 285
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 10
66% 16
75% 23
80% 28
90% 44
95% 59
98% 79
99% 94
100% 285 (longest request)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzi...@apache.org>
Date: Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:11 AM
Subject: [Bug 62590] performance drop after moving from apache 2.2 to
apache 2.4
To: b...@httpd.apache.org
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62590
--- Comment #1 from paolo <pa...@adnovum.ch> ---
After some debug-session I found out that the problem are the
ERR_clear_error
calls in ssl_filter_write and ssl_io_input_read. If I remove those calls the
performance is the same like with httpd/2.2.
Are those calls really needed in the ssl_io_input_read/ssl_filter_write
function?
Isn't it enough to have it only in the ssl_io_filter_handshake function.
Or what about to call this function only if an error occurred:
else /* (rc < 0) */ {
int ssl_err = SSL_get_error(inctx->filter_ctx->pssl, rc);
conn_rec *c = (conn_rec*)SSL_get_app_data(
inctx->filter_ctx->pssl);
+ ERR_clear_error();
if (ssl_err == SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ) {
Many thanks for any answer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
