On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM.
>
> On what configuration are you running your tests, Rüdiger? macOS, just like
> Jim?
Centos 7.5 64 Bit
Regards
Rüdiger
>
> CJ
>
> Le 11/10/2018 à 13:35, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>> FWIW, on macOS, both trunk and httpd-2.4 fail on this test:
>>
>> t/modules/buffer.t .................. 3/12 # Failed test 4 in
>> t/modules/buffer.t at line 32
>> t/modules/buffer.t .................. 7/12 # Failed test 8 in
>> t/modules/buffer.t at line 32 fail #2
>> t/modules/buffer.t .................. 11/12 # Failed test 12 in
>> t/modules/buffer.t at line 32 fail #3
>> t/modules/buffer.t .................. Failed 3/12 subtests
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 11, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>>> <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35?
>>> Regards
>>> Rüdiger
>>> Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13
>>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>>> Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36
>>> Waouh!
>>>
>>>
>>> This would mean I've provided a new useful test!
>>>
>>> (it has been added recently in r1841508)
>>>
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>>
>>> I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data
>>> when running the test framework.
>>>
>>> This helps to spot where new tests are needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> CJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Message du 11/10/18 10:08
>>>> De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
>>>> A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" <dev@httpd.apache.org>
>>>> Copie à :
>>>> Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36
>>>>
>>>> Anyone else seeing
>>>>
>>>> t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2)
>>>> Failed tests: 8, 12
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> I don't see this with trunk on the same machine. Issue seems to be if
>>>> input filtering is on on large POSTs.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Rüdiger
>
>
