Le 10/10/2018 à 21:18, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.36:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are:
sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz
sha256:
ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288
*httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz
+1, Good to go for me.
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04, compiled with gcc 8.1.0.
Tested with event, prefork and worker.
Test coverage data from my test environment attached.
However, I have:
t/modules/info.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
t/security/CVE-2005-3352.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
t/security/CVE-2007-5000.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
All are related to mod_imagemap. It was not activated in my test
environment before, so I don't know how it was previously.
According to the test coverage data, the 'imap_handler' function is
never called!?!?
It is likely a miss configuration in my test environment, but wanted to
report if it rings a bell to someone.
CJ
Title: HTTPd Test Coverage
|
HTTPd Test Coverage
|
This should give us some idea of how well our test-framework actually stress our
code.
Last generated jeudi 11 octobre 2018, 21:00:55 (UTC+0200)
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 1997-2018, The Apache Software Foundation
|
|
