On 7/30/2020 2:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:10 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Jul 30, 2020, at 5:55 AM, Christophe JAILLET > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I wouldn't say it is a show stopper, but I thought that we had a > travis job for that. > > Apparently, it is on trunk only (see r1879370 which is not > backported, maybe on purpose) > > I agree that it's not a show-stopper but it is something that > seems easy to fix and, considering that (1) we want to release the > best possible version as we can and (2) there is quite a bit of > time between releases, I wouldn't be opposed if the RM decided to > skip 2.4.45 and go w/ 2.4.46. > > > Agreed. And Steffen points out there is precedence. >
Aye - and I'd hate to appear inconsistent :-) Version numbers are cheap - I'll re-roll when we have confirmation all is good in the 2.4 branch. -- Daniel Ruggeri
