On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:33:29 +0000 Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Very occasionally we backport patches to RHEL's httpd package in a > way that introduces new or different logging output from 2.4/trunk. > I'm wondering if there is any opinion about vendors asking for for a > small (say, 100?) reserved range of APLOGNO() space to use for such > cases? Basically I'd just commit "next-number += 100" and use that > range within downstream patches since they are then reserved upstream. Is there any possibility that a vendor-RH message leaking upstream to us - i.e. you introduce something RH and later commit it to trunk? If so, would you want to preserve the vendor number or just reassign a new one? No strong views, but if pressed I'd +1 to Stefan's suggestion. Simple, and something you can do without touching our repos. -- Nick Kew
