On 7/16/24 5:02 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:34 AM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
>>>> from Subversion to Git.
>>>> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer
>>>> available via svn.apache.org. It
>>>> will be available via Git at
>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git and
>>>> https://github.com/apache/httpd.git.
>>>> Github also offers the possibility to use a Subversion client:
>>>> https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/working-with-subversion-on-github/support-for-subversion-clients
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage
>>>> the features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
>>>> [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't
>>>> want to work with Github and I will only work with
>>>> what gitbox.apache.org offers.
>>>> [ ]: Leave everything as is.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After being open for one week I call this vote closed. Thank you for
>>> everyone who participated in this vote by
>>> either voting directly or voicing opinions on the subject.
>>>
>>> Result:
>>>
>>> Total number of votes: 16
>>>
>>> [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the
>>> features of Github (for now Actions and PR).
>>>
>>> 13 votes by jorton, ylavic, icing, gbechis, covener, humbedooh, rjung,
>>> jailletc36, jblond, gstein, rpluem, jim, fielding.
>>>
>>> [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't
>>> want to work with Github and I will only work with
>>> what gitbox.apache.org offers.
>>>
>>> 0 votes.
>>>
>>> [ ]: Leave everything as is.
>>>
>>> 3 votes by manu, ivan, minfrin.
>>>
>>
>> Now that the vote is closed in favor of moving to Git what are the next
>> steps?
>> Do we need to open an INFRA ticket to get this done?
>> Who will open it?
>> Is there any preferred point of time to do this?
>
> FYI was thinking about this during the latest release -- I created a
> cwiki topic here to track any work that would be needed to move to
> read/write git:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=311628229
>
> I split it into a few sections based on timing. Currently I don't
> even think the release scripts are a blocker -- It would be much
> easier to run through it live on a low stakes release then trying to
> mock it up or make a bunch of blind changes.
>
> I think what's practical once we migrate might inform things like what
> we decide on how RTC works, including RTC exceptions. Maybe infra
> folks have some experience to share on the spectrum of options?
>
Just left a comment on the Wiki page.
Regards
Rüdiger
