I vote for the second option. Also it can give time to analyze on how to deal with backwards compatibility. I ll take a look at the RFC later tonight and get back.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > One issue I have some open questions myself > > Is it ok to assume log will have old data block versions, followed by new > data block versions. For e.g, if rollout new code, then revert back then > there could be an arbitrary mix of new and old data blocks. Handling this > might make design/code fairly complex. Alternatively we can keep it simple > for now, disable by default and only advise to enable for new tables or > when hudi version is stable > > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:13 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HUDI/RFC-6+Add+indexing+support+to+the+log+file > > > > > > Feedback welcome, on this RFC tackling HUDI-86 > > >
