+1 on standardizing code formatting. On Tuesday, August 18, 2020, 03:58:42 PM PDT, Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> wrote: can more people please chime in? This will affect all of us on a daily basis :)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 8:25 AM Gary Li <yanjia.gary...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vote for mvn spotless:apply to do the auto fix. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:13 AM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Anyone has thoughts on this? > > > > esp leesf/vinoyang, given you both drove much of the initial cleanups. > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 7:16 PM Shiyan Xu <xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > in that case, yes, all for automation. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 7:12 PM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Overall, I think we should standardize this across the project. > > > > But most importantly, may be revive the long dormant spotless effort > > > first > > > > to enable autofixing of checkstyle issues, before we add more > checking? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 7:04 PM Shiyan Xu < > xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that throughout the codebase, when method arguments wrap > > to a > > > > new > > > > > line, there are cases where indentation is 4 and other cases align > > the > > > > > wrapped line to the previous line of argument. > > > > > > > > > > The latter is caused by intelliJ settings of "Align when multiline" > > > > > enabled. This won't be flagged by checkstyle due to not setting > > > > > *forceStrictCondition* to *true* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/config_misc.html#Indentation_Properties > > > > > > > > > > I'm suggesting setting this to true to avoid the discrepancy and > > > > redundant > > > > > diffs in PR caused by individual IDE settings. People who have set > > > "Align > > > > > when multiline" will need to disable it to pass the checkstyle > > > > validation. > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Raymond > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >