I will try to get to it this evening or later this afternoon.

On 7/6/05, Roberto R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, thanks Larry!
>  
>  Fixing up the NAnt scripts is on my JIRA TODO list, but I haven't gotten
> around to it yet.  :-(
>  
>  Either Linux or Windows would work, but getting it going on Windows would
> probably be faster at this point. 
>  
>  Roberto
> 
> 
>  
> On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, i just bopped into the irc channel, and there are no boxen to
> > actually *do* the builds on (unless we are using gump), only to hold
> > the results.
> > 
> > I have 6-8 boxes in my basement..I think one has a linux on it that i 
> > can use to set up some stuff to get it going. So, do you think
> > ibatis.net will build on linux with mono and nant? If not i suppose I
> > can setup a winwoes box for you... ;-)
> > 
> > Larry
> > 
> > On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There's plenty of hardware for things like this. It's just a matter of
> > > spending some quality time with infrastructure, preferably by IRC [and 
> > > I think everyone knows how much I adore IRC :)].
> > >
> > > * http://apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html
> > >
> > > Several projects have their own zone on helios now: 
> > >
> > > *  http://apache.org/dev/machines.html
> > >
> > > -T.
> > >
> > > On 7/6/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > That sounds reasonable to me. I would be more than willing to set up a
> > > > box to do the builds here if there is not one at apache to use.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know if there is one already? 
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > > On 7/6/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > All ASF projects are expected to provide automatic nightly builds.
> We 
> > > > > just haven't gotten to around to that yet. The nightly builds live
> for
> > > > > seven days each, and then get recycled, so as to not eat up too much
> > > > > disk space.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any non-automatic release is generally tagged with a sequential
> > > > > version number. After someone rolls it, we vote on it's quality:
> > > > > Alpha, Beta, General Release. A release can start out as Alpha and 
> > > > > work its way up to General Release as more people try it. A release
> > > > > can also be downgraded if a problem is found later.
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, since the Subversion revision numbers are essentially
> tags, 
> > > > > we could also snag any given nightly build  (once we have them) and
> > > > > designate it "version #.#.#", making a note in our status file that
> > > > > version #.#.# corresponds to SVN revision ####. 
> > > > >
> > > > > Later, if we ever need to branch, we can branch on a revision number
> > > > > as easily as a tag.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Ted.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/5/05, Sven Boden < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not specific to the problem below. But what about providing iBATIS
> > > > > > development releases, e.g. after every big round of SVN changes.
> Most
> > > > > > other projects seem to do it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A few advantages I see:
> > > > > > - It's easier to tell people: "test with the development jar
> files" 
> > > > > > than "extract the sources from SVN, compile and test"
> > > > > > - Better quality of releases as more people would already test/use
> the
> > > > > > development releases. 
> > > > > > - Less "pressure" to release new versions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Sven Boden
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:29:03 -0600, you wrote: 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >As soon as brandon gives the go-ahead on IBATIS-148, then we'll
> be good to
> > > > > > >go!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Cheers,
> > > > > > >clinton
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >On 7/5/05, Guido García Bernardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I am facing with this bug:
> > > > > > >>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IBATIS-152 , solved in
> 2.1.5
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Is there any release plan for 2.1.5 so that I can decide
> whether or not
> > > > > > >> I'll need to use 2.0.9b or compile the source? 
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thank you very much.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Guido García Bernardo - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >> Tfn. +34 983 54 89 08
> > > > > > >> ITDEUSTO - Valladolid
> > >
> > 
> 
>

Reply via email to