+1
> On 28 Feb 2019, at 07:47, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> El jue., 28 feb. 2019 a las 8:00, Dongjoon Hyun (<[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:
> +1
>
> On 2019/02/27 21:41:56, RD <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matt Cheah <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From: *Ryan Blue <[email protected]>
> > > *Reply-To: *"[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "
> > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > *Date: *Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 1:36 PM
> > > *To: *Iceberg Dev List <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Community code reviews
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:11 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a follow-up to the discussion thread, where we seem to have
> > > consensus around the proposal to allow committers to commit their own pull
> > > requests if a contributor has reviewed it and given a +1 and the PR has
> > > been open for at least a couple of days to give time for other comments.
> > > This is also only effective for 2019. After that, we should rely on a
> > > larger base of committers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on this proposal in the next 3 days.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, accept contributor reviews for committer pull requests
> > >
> > > [ ] +0, . . .
> > >
> > > [ ] -1, I think this is a bad idea because . . .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > rb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Ryan Blue
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Netflix
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Ryan Blue
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Netflix
> > >
> >
