+1
> On 28 Feb 2019, at 07:47, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
> <renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> El jue., 28 feb. 2019 a las 8:00, Dongjoon Hyun (<dongj...@apache.org
> <mailto:dongj...@apache.org>>) escribió:
> +1
>
> On 2019/02/27 21:41:56, RD <rdsr...@gmail.com <mailto:rdsr...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matt Cheah <mch...@palantir.com
> > <mailto:mch...@palantir.com>> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From: *Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.INVALID>
> > > *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org <mailto:dev@iceberg.apache.org>"
> > > <dev@iceberg.apache.org <mailto:dev@iceberg.apache.org>>, "
> > > rb...@netflix.com <mailto:rb...@netflix.com>" <rb...@netflix.com
> > > <mailto:rb...@netflix.com>>
> > > *Date: *Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 1:36 PM
> > > *To: *Iceberg Dev List <dev@iceberg.apache.org
> > > <mailto:dev@iceberg.apache.org>>
> > > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Community code reviews
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:11 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com
> > > <mailto:rb...@netflix.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a follow-up to the discussion thread, where we seem to have
> > > consensus around the proposal to allow committers to commit their own pull
> > > requests if a contributor has reviewed it and given a +1 and the PR has
> > > been open for at least a couple of days to give time for other comments.
> > > This is also only effective for 2019. After that, we should rely on a
> > > larger base of committers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on this proposal in the next 3 days.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, accept contributor reviews for committer pull requests
> > >
> > > [ ] +0, . . .
> > >
> > > [ ] -1, I think this is a bad idea because . . .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > rb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Ryan Blue
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Netflix
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Ryan Blue
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Netflix
> > >
> >
