Hey, thanks for bringing these up. I'm planning on spending some time
reviewing tomorrow and I can take a look at the first two.

I just merged the first one since it was small, thanks for the fix! Feel
free to ping me or other committers to review these. I do think it is
important to have a committer review, even if the community also has
positive reviews.

rb

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:15 PM OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> As we know that we next release 0.10.0 is coming, there are several issues
> which should be merged as soon as possible in my mind:
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1477
>
> It will change the flink state design to maintain the complete data files
> into manifest before checkpoint finished,  it good for minimal the flink
> state size and improve the state compatibility (Before that we will
> serialize the DataFile into flink state backend, while DataFile class have
> depended some java serializable classes, the means if we change the
> dependencies classes,  it may fail to deserialize the state).  Currently,
> I gained a +1 from  Steven Zhen Wu, thanks for his patient reviewing.
> According to the apache rule,  I need another +1 from iceberg committers,
> anyone have time to get the review finished ?
>
> 2. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1586
>
> This will introduce options to load the external hive-site.xml for flink
> hive catalog, which is really helpful for production environment, not a
> hard change.  But will still need a review from iceberg members.  Thanks.
>
> 3. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/1619
>
> We introduced another write parallelism for iceberg flink stream writers.
> Thanks kbendick and Stevenzwu for the reviewing,  gain two +1 now.  Should
> I merge this ?
>
>
> Besides the flink PRs,  it is very beneficial to put forward other related
> issues which is blocking the release 0.10.0 .  I am happy to help resolve
> these issues.
>
> Thanks.
>
>


-- 
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Netflix

Reply via email to