Update:

I think the project  [Flink: Upgrade to 1.13.2][1] in RoadMap can be closed
now, because all of the issues have been addressed.

[1]. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/projects/12

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 6:17 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@dremio.com>
wrote:

> I created a Roadmap section in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3163
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3163> that links to the planning
> boards that Jack created. I figured it makes sense if we link available
> Design Docs directly on those Boards (as was already done), because then
> the Design docs are closer to the set of related issues.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:02 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jack!
>>
>> Eduard, I think that's a good idea. We should have a roadmap page as well
>> that links to the projects that Jack just created.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like we have reached some consensus around the projects listed
>>> here. I have created corresponding Github projects for each:
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/projects
>>>
>>> Related design docs are also linked there.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jack Ye
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:18 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@dremio.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to have a section on the website where we collect
>>>> all the links to the design docs/specs as that would be easier to find than
>>>> searching for things on the ML?
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking about something like for each component:
>>>> * link to the ML discussion
>>>> * link to the actual Spec/Design Doc
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:38 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> At the last sync meeting, we brought up publishing a community roadmap
>>>>> and brainstormed the many features and initiatives that the community is
>>>>> working on. In this thread, I want to make sure that we have a good list 
>>>>> of
>>>>> what people are thinking about and I think we should try to categorize the
>>>>> projects by size and general priority. When we reach a rough agreement,
>>>>> I’ll write this up and post it on the ASF site along with links to some
>>>>> projects in Github.
>>>>>
>>>>> My rationale for attempting to prioritize projects is that if we try
>>>>> to do too many things, it will be slower progress across everything rather
>>>>> than getting a few important items done. I know that priorities don’t 
>>>>> align
>>>>> very cleanly in practice, but it is hopefully worth trying. To come up 
>>>>> with
>>>>> a priority, I’m trying to keep top priority items to a minimum by 
>>>>> including
>>>>> only one from each group (Spark, Flink, Python, etc.). The remaining items
>>>>> are split between priority 2 and 3. Priority 3 is not urgent, including
>>>>> things that can be plugged in (like other IO libraries), docs, etc.
>>>>> Everything else is priority 2.
>>>>>
>>>>> That something isn’t priority 1 doesn’t mean it isn’t important or
>>>>> progressing, just that it isn’t the current focus. I think of it this way:
>>>>> if someone has extra time to review something, what should be next? That’s
>>>>> top priority.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here’s my rough categorization. If you disagree, please speak up:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - If you think that something should be top priority, what gets
>>>>>    moved to priority 2?
>>>>>    - Should the priority for a project in 2 or 3 change?
>>>>>    - Is the S/M/L size of a project wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Top priority, 1:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - API: Iceberg 1.0 [medium]
>>>>>    - Spark: Merge-on-read plans [large]
>>>>>    - Maintenance: Delete file compaction [medium]
>>>>>    -
>>>>>
>>>>>    Flink: Upgrade to 1.13.2 (document compatibility) [medium]
>>>>>    -
>>>>>
>>>>>    Python: Pythonic refactor [medium]
>>>>>
>>>>> Priority 2:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - ORC: Support delete files stored as ORC [small]
>>>>>    - Spark: DSv2 streaming improvements [small]
>>>>>    - Flink: Inline file compaction [small]
>>>>>    - Flink: Support UPSERT [small]
>>>>>    - Views: Spec [medium]
>>>>>    - Spec: Z-ordering / Space-filling curves [medium]
>>>>>    - Spec: Snapshot tagging and branching [small]
>>>>>    - Spec: Secondary indexes [large]
>>>>>    - Spec v3: Encryption [large]
>>>>>    -
>>>>>
>>>>>    Spec v3: Relative paths [large]
>>>>>    -
>>>>>
>>>>>    Spec v3: Default field values [medium]
>>>>>
>>>>> Priority 3:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Docs: versioned docs [medium]
>>>>>    - IO: Support Aliyun OSS/DLF [medium]
>>>>>    - IO: Support Dell ECS [medium]
>>>>>
>>>>> External:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Trino: Bucketed joins [small]
>>>>>    - Trino: Row-level delete support [medium]
>>>>>    - Trino: Merge-on-read plans [medium]
>>>>>    - Trino: Multi-catalog support [small]
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>> Tabular
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Tabular
>>
>

Reply via email to