I agree that if we can separate the discussion about how to support Hive,
then we should do that.

+1 to removing Java 8 support
+1 to adding Java 21 support.

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 12:58 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 in favor of adding java 21 support
> +1 in favor of removing java 8 support
>
> I am currently working on Spark 4.0 / Iceberg integration
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>. Spark 4.0 runs on Java
> 17/21.
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 4:58 AM Piotr Findeisen <piotr.findei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We recently started to test Hive3 with Java 11 and 17
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10482> and the tests pass.
>> So dropping Java 8 doesn't technically require removing the Hive 3
>> related modules, unless users cannot do anything useful with them (because
>> e.g. they can only run Hive runtime with Java 8 for some reason).
>> Peter, can you please confirm this is not the case?
>> Then it seems we could proceed with JDK 8 drop and discuss what to do
>> with Hive modules *separately*.
>>
>> re original question of adding JDK 21 support -- we seem to have strong
>> consensus to add it.
>> Eduard plans to merge the PR once 1.6.0 is out. So I think we no longer
>> need to debate this topic, unless there are any new objections to be raised.
>>
>>
>> Best
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 13:49, Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Back to the main topic:
>>>
>>> Removing java8 support still allows us to use the old HMS libraries, so
>>> iceberg-hive-metastore module is not affected in this sense. We still need
>>> to run the tests, to ensure that there is no changes in the behaviour, but
>>> it is unlikely.
>>>
>>> +1 in favor of adding java 21 support
>>> +1 in favor of removing java 8 support - especially if it is not bound
>>> to removing Hive support as well
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. júl. 19., P,
>>> 4:56):
>>>
>>>> A basic question, is iceberg-hive-metastore considered part of the
>>>> "Hive module"?
>>>>
>>>> I suppose that HMS 2.x is still widely used. AFAIK, the current
>>>> iceberg-hive-metastore is compatible with HMS 2.1+, based on Iceberg
>>>> and Spark CI, I also suppose it works well with Java 8 to 21.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Cheng Pan
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 4:44 AM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for the context, Denys and Peter. Sounds like there's a good
>>>> question here about where the Hive integration should live and the most
>>>> recent decision was to maintain that support in Hive. I definitely hear the
>>>> point about Hive 3 users depending on the Iceberg modules. I'm also glad to
>>>> hear that some of the issues are expected to be fixed with the release of
>>>> Hive 4.0.x.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think that we have two separate questions for how to move forward
>>>> with Hive support, depending on the Hive version. There is a question about
>>>> what we do with the current Hive modules and what to do with the Hive 4
>>>> support that has been developed externally.
>>>> >
>>>> > For Hive 2.x and 3.x, we have code in the Iceberg repo that is not
>>>> being developed. Hive 2 is fairly easy since it is EOL. While Hive 3 is
>>>> still used, I don't think it makes sense to keep releasing versions of it
>>>> if it requires Java 8, which has not been publicly maintained for 5 years.
>>>> We need to upgrade and that is at odds with keeping support for Hive 3. As
>>>> Fokko and I both pointed out, people can still use older releases.
>>>> >
>>>> > For the question of how to maintain support for Hive 4, I think it's
>>>> worth having a separate discussion (probably not on the thread about JDK
>>>> versions) about where to maintain it. I think that it is best to maintain
>>>> integration in engines and not in the Iceberg project; there are few
>>>> implementations here and I think that it is a hard problem for Iceberg to
>>>> maintain support for multiple versions (as you can see with support for so
>>>> many different Flink, Hive, and Spark versions).
>>>> >
>>>> > Ryan
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:25 AM Denys Kuzmenko <dkuzme...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> In the following 1-2 months we plan to release HIVE-4.0.1 which
>>>> includes bug fixes and then focus on HIVE-4.1.0 release with jdk17.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Ryan Blue
>>>> > Databricks
>>>>
>>>

-- 
Ryan Blue
Databricks

Reply via email to