+1!

> On Oct 30, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> -Dan
> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:51 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Prashant 
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:16 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> +1  - My comments are clear on the other thread for future proposals
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> -0
>>>> 
>>>> Great work and exciting functionality, but transferring concerns from the 
>>>> other thread about the decision.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Szehon
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Steven Wu <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:07 AM xianjin <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 PM Anton Okolnychyi 
>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi folks,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > We have been discussing the new layout for position deletes in V3 for 
>>>>>>> > a while now. It seems the community reached consensus. I'd like to 
>>>>>>> > start a vote on adding deletion vectors to the V3 spec as described 
>>>>>>> > in PRs 11238 and 11240. You can see a prototype of the proposed spec 
>>>>>>> > changes in PR 11302.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Design doc discussion thread: 
>>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ypt0jowf3zosw6f6bxt25jxc3vdgps9
>>>>>>> > Spec changes discussion thread: 
>>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyon0kvroxsmkxh153444xzscwbb68o1
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>>>>>> > [ ] -0
>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > - Anton

Reply via email to