+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve!
~ Anurag > On Feb 13, 2025, at 10:34 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:56 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) >> >>> On Feb 13, 2025, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:07 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Op do 13 feb 2025 om 18:06 schreef Steven Wu <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>>> +1 here. >>>>> >>>>> already approved the PR yesterday >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:17 AM Russell Spitzer >>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:30 PM Steve Zhang >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Iceberg Community, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm working on supporting the registration of iceberg metadata for an >>>>>>> existing table in the catalog. As part of this work, I'm proposing to >>>>>>> add an optional boolean field in RegisterTableRequest. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd like to start a vote on this REST spec change: >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12239 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add overwriteRequested to RegisterTableRequest in REST spec >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Steve Zhang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>
