+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:51 AM Anurag Mantripragada <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, Steve! > > ~ Anurag > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2025, at 10:34 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:56 AM Huang-Hsiang Cheng > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Feb 13, 2025, at 9:36 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:07 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Op do 13 feb 2025 om 18:06 schreef Steven Wu <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> +1 here. >>>> >>>> already approved the PR yesterday >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:17 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:30 PM Steve Zhang >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Iceberg Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm working on supporting the registration of iceberg metadata for >>>>>> an existing table in the catalog. As part of this work, I'm proposing to >>>>>> add an optional boolean field in RegisterTableRequest. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote on this REST spec change: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12239 >>>>>> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Add overwriteRequested to RegisterTableRequest in REST spec >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Steve Zhang >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >
